
Join us to demand BC keep and improve healthcare mask protections.
How to use: This form lets you email dozens of BC decision-makers at once. Enter your address to help find your local representative, then scroll past the list of recipients, review, and send.
If you have capacity, we encourage you to personalize the email for greater effectiveness. Even just changing the subject line or adding one sentence at the beginning can help!
Note: the “Action Network” tool requires a return address so their system can find your MLA. If you prefer not to enter your address, you can use our template wording to email policy-makers yourself.
BC currently requires masks in government-run medical settings, but has signaled they plan to drop these protections this spring. Past removal of mask rules drew heavy criticism from patients, doctors, researchers, and BC’s Human Rights Commissioner, and masks have been restored twice so far in two years.
Inconsistent mask requirements mean inconsistent safety. Vulnerability isn’t seasonal, and both patients and frontline workers need a reliable baseline of safety – not policies that shift with the weather. Contagious illnesses remain a risk throughout the year, particularly in settings full of sick people. Constantly shifting rules also lead to confusion, with reports that hospitals fail to follow and enforce changing requirements, and experts criticizing late, ineffective implementation.
This spring, we call on BC policy-makers to keep and strengthen healthcare mask protections with these practical steps:
- Maintain healthcare mask requirements year-round. Prevention should be proactive, not reactive, especially as COVID-19 has increased over the summer months for three years straight. We’re also seeing an atypical late-season increase in influenza and a surge in measles, alongside other illnesses like norovirus, RSV, and potentially H5N1.
- Provide clear direction to all health authorities on concrete steps to enact mask requirements. This includes requiring hospital admin to direct managers on implementation; posting signage; making masks available; and designating staff members responsible for informing and monitoring staff, visitors, and patients.
- Increase usage of N95-equivalent masks or better (a.k.a. respirators), which provide superior protection as the only masks rated to properly protect against airborne illnesses. Clearly communicate the federal and international scientific consensus that COVID-19 is airborne, and use appropriate respiratory protection. Follow the European model in making N95-equivalent masks a default choice for high-risk settings, and ensure all who wish to wear a respirator (or request it of their healthcare providers) can do so.
- Close gaps in existing rules. This includes requiring patients to mask (with reasonable exceptions and accommodations) and providing N95-equivalent masks for potential airborne illnesses; ensuring mask coverage in shared locations where patients must be, including foyers and hallways (where patients often need to wait); and directing private healthcare settings to meet the same minimum mask requirements as government-run facilities.
Take the next steps
Try to send as many messages as possible by April 1, 2025:

5. Attend meetings
Request a meeting or phone call with your MLA, attend open board meetings, and more!
More on why this matters
“If there is one space that all vulnerable people should be able to rely on to prioritize their safety, it is in healthcare settings…removal of universal masking directives in healthcare settings does not uphold a human rights centred approach to public health.”
BC Human Rights Commissioner
Past versions
About Us
We’re a non-partisan action group of British Columbians advocating for evidence-based safety measures in high-risk settings.